![]() You start with an MP3 rip of a CD even at 256Kbps, youve already lost audio information you can never get those bits back. MP3s, unlike FLAC, have something of a poor generational half-life. Its all about preservation and archiving FLAC uses less space than WAV, and allows more precise tagging, making it ideal as a long-term digital storage medium for audio. WAV does have the advantage of being much more editing DJ-friendly (all computers do native WAV decode, meaning less work for the CPU), but thats not really relevant to what were talking about here. Second, it allows the use of more tags (including illegal tags in Windows) for marking files. WAV preserves 100 of audio information in 16-bit 44.1KHz stereo format when ripping audio from a CD.įirst, it does everything WAV does (lossless audio), but in a much smaller package (WAV is extremely inefficient in its use of space). Really, it is as much as I am annoyed by FLAC purists, FLAC has a real place in the digital audio world that should not be overlooked. Lets learn about FLAC, why its good, and why it isnt, shall we.įLAC is a lossless format, meaning none of the data from the source recording is compressed or removed (assuming you use the same bit depth not the same thing as bit rate and frequency range).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |